Once again, did you read what I wrote?Chapo wrote:and spectators want to see tight matches not just a guy owning every one else.
lolomax wrote:Of course, spectators would certainly be interested in the whole competition, but for the player you are, wouldn't it be bad to know you'll probably lose because of luck?
You're taking the extreme case there. It wouldn't be the case on any of the TMU environments, as you seem to think.Chapo wrote:I don't think it would be interesting for the guy who wins eswc without any good opponent.
Maybe because TMU is better than TMN (now stop saying TMN is better than TMU, it contains less things so TMU is better (or at least as good, if you do think everything TMU has more than TMN is rubbish), and also appreciated even if not famous.Chapo wrote:What I mean is that tmn is a game which is appreciated by both the public and the players, why change it to tmu ?
Yes it is 1/7 of TMU !!!! It's also another different game, but it still is a small part of TMU. Do not expect explanations about it, the reasons have already been mentioned in this thread.Chapo wrote:tmnf is not 1/7 of tmuf, it's one single game.
"It wouldn't be the case on any of the TMU environments." Definitely.Chapo wrote:They will see one guy owning an environment, another one owning the next
Same here But I highly doubt it will ever happen.Jamie wrote:I just would really like to see some United action .. that of what i have voted for
I just would be happy if my favourite game became recognized, but I'm also really satisfied of TMU competitions as they are nowadays (I mean ET competitions). All in all, seeing TMU picked for WCG would be a great thing, but, actually, I can do without it.